Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Sep 27;12(10):2341. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12102341.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Fungal hip prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are rare but severe infections. Their incidence has increased in the last decades due to the aging population, as well as due to the increased number of immunosuppressed hosts. The present review of all published fungal PJIs in hip arthroplasties aims to present as much data as possible for both medical and surgical treatment options, so that the best applicable management may be concluded. Methods: A meticulous review of all published fungal hip PJIs was conducted. Information regarding demographics, causative fungus, antifungal treatment (AFT), surgical management as well as the infection outcome was recorded. Results: A total of 89 patients suffering fungal hip PJI were identified. The patients’ mean age was 66.9 years. The mean time from initial arthroplasty to onset of symptoms was 69.3 months, while 40.4% of the patients were immunocompromised. The most common imaging method indicating diagnosis was plain X-ray or CT scan (20.2%), while definite diagnosis had become possible through cultures in most cases (98.9%), and/or histology (44.9%). The most frequently isolated fungus was C. albicans (49.4%), followed by C. parapsilosis (18%) and C. glabrata (12.4%), while bacterial co-infection was present in 32 cases (36%). Two-stage revision arthroplasty (TSRA) was the most commonly performed procedure (52.8%), with mean time between the two stages = 7.9 months. Regarding antifungal treatment (AFT), fluconazole was the preferred agent (62.9%), followed by amphotericin B (36%), while the mean duration of AFT was 5.1 months. Outcome was successful in 68 cases (76.4%). Conclusions: Both diagnosis and management of fungal PJIs in patients having undergone total hip arthroplasty are quite demanding. A multidisciplinary approach is of utmost importance, since the combination of AFT and TSRA appears to be the proper treatment method.

PMID:36292030 | DOI:10.3390/diagnostics12102341

Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jan 14;12(1):201. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12010201.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Osteomyelitis caused by Aspergillus spp. is a severe, but rare, clinical entity. However, clear guidelines regarding the most effective medical management have not yet been established. The present study is a literature review of all such cases, in an effort to elucidate epidemiology, as well as the therapeutic management and the infection’s outcome.

METHODS: A thorough review of all reports of osteomyelitis of the appendicular and the axial skeleton, without the skull and the spine, caused by Aspergillus spp. was undertaken. Data about demographics, imaging techniques facilitating diagnosis, causative Aspergillus, method of mold isolation, antifungal treatment (AFT), surgical treatment, as well as the infection’s outcome were recorded and evaluated.

RESULTS: A total of 63 cases of osseous infection due to Aspergillus spp. were identified. The studied population’s mean age was 37.9 years. The most commonly affected site was the rib cage (36.8%). Most hosts suffered immunosuppressive conditions (76.2%). Regarding imaging methods indicating diagnosis, computer tomography (CT) was performed in most cases (42.9%), followed by plain X-ray (41.3%) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (34.9%). The most frequent isolated mold was Aspergillus fumigatus (49.2%). Cultures and/or histopathology were used for definite diagnosis in all cases, while galactomannan antigen test was additionally used in seven cases (11.1%), polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in four cases (6.3%), and beta-d-glucan testing in three cases (4.8%). Regarding AFT, the preferred antifungal was voriconazole (61.9%). Most patients underwent surgical debridement (63.5%). The outcome was successful in 77.5%.

DISCUSSION: Osteomyelitis due to Aspergillus spp. represents a severe infection. The available data suggest that prolonged AFT in combination with surgical debridement is the preferred management of this infection, while identification of the responsible mold is of paramount importance.

PMID:35054368 | DOI:10.3390/diagnostics12010201

Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Oct 14;11(10):1899. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11101899.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Spondylodiscitis caused by Aspergillus spp. is a rare but life-threatening clinical entity. However, a consensus on diagnostic criteria and most effective medical management is still missing. The present study is a review of all published cases of spondylodiscitis caused by Aspergillus spp., in an effort to elucidate epidemiology, patients’ characteristics, andand the medical and surgical treatment options and their effectiveness.

METHODS: A thorough review of all existing spondylodiscitis cases caused by Aspergillus was performed. Data regarding demographics, responsible fungus, time between symptoms’ onset and firm diagnosis, antifungal treatment (AFT), surgical intervention, andand the infection’s outcome were investigated.

RESULTS: A total of 118 Aspergillus spondylodiscitis cases, yielding 119 Aspergillus spp. isolates, were identified in the literature. The patients’ mean age was 40.6 years. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (after its introduction) indicated the diagnosis in most cases (66.7%), while definite diagnosis was established through cultures in the majority of cases (73.7%). Aspergillus fumigatus was isolated in most cases (73; 61.3%), followed by Aspergillus flavus (15; 12.6%) andand Aspergillus nidulans and terreus (7; 5.9%, each). The mean time between symptoms’ onset and diagnosis was 5.7 months. Amphotericin B was the preferred antifungal regiment (84 cases; 71.2%), followed by voriconazole (31; 26.3%), and the mean AFT duration was 6.1 months. The final outcome was successful in 93 cases (78.8%). Furthermore, 77 patients (65.3%) underwent surgery.

CONCLUSIONS: Spondylodiscitis caused by Aspergillus spp. represents a clinical challenge, requiring a multidisciplinary approach. The present review has shown that prolonged AFT has been the standard of care of the studied cases, while surgical treatment seems to play an important role in selected patents.

PMID:34679596 | PMC:PMC8534844 | DOI:10.3390/diagnostics11101899

Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Aug 4;11(8):1410. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11081410.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Fungal prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are rare, especially those caused by non-Candida species. Treatment has not been fully elucidated, since a plethora of antifungal and surgical interventions have been proposed. Τhis study represents an effort to clarify the optimal management of non-Candida fungal PJIs, by reviewing all relevant published cases.

METHODS: A thorough review of all existing non-Candida fungal PJIs in the literature was conducted. Data regarding demographics, responsible organisms, antifungal treatment (AFT), surgical intervention, time between initial arthroplasty and onset of symptoms, and time between onset of symptoms and firm diagnosis, as well as the infection’s outcome, were evaluated.

RESULTS: Forty-two PJIs, in patients with mean age of 66.2 years, were found and reviewed. Aspergillus spp. were isolated in most cases (10; 23.8%), followed by Coccidioides spp. (7; 16.7%) and Pichiaanomala (5; 11.9%). Fluconazole was the preferred antifungal regimen (20 cases; 47.6%), followed by amphotericin B (18 cases; 42.9%), while the mean AFT duration was 9.4 months (SD = 7.06). Two-stage revision arthroplasty (TSRA) was performed in 22 cases (52.4%), with the mean time between stages being 5.2 months (SD = 2.9). The mean time between initial joint implantation and onset of symptoms was 42.1 months (SD = 50.7), while the mean time between onset of symptoms and diagnosis was 5.8 months (SD = 14.3).

CONCLUSIONS: Non-Candida fungal PJIs pose a clinical challenge, demanding a multidisciplinary approach. The present review has shown that combination of TSRA separated by a 3-6-month interval and prolonged AFT has been the standard of care in the studied cases.

PMID:34441344 | DOI:10.3390/diagnostics11081410